The Urantia Book
              
               PAPER 161 
              
               FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH RODAN
              
               
                
              161:0.1 ON SUNDAY, September 25, A.D. 29, the 
              apostles and the evangelists assembled at Magadan. After a long 
              conference that evening with his associates, Jesus surprised all 
              by announcing that early the next day he and the twelve apostles 
              would start for Jerusalem to attend the feast of tabernacles. He 
              directed that the evangelists visit the believers in Galilee, and 
              that the women's corps return for a while to Bethsaida.
                
              161:0.2 When the hour came to leave for 
              Jerusalem, Nathaniel and Thomas were still in the midst of their 
              discussions with Rodan of Alexandria, and they secured the 
              Master's permission to remain at Magadan for a few days. And so, 
              while Jesus and the ten were on their way to Jerusalem, Nathaniel 
              and Thomas were engaged in earnest debate with Rodan. The week 
              prior, in which Rodan had expounded his philosophy, Thomas and 
              Nathaniel had alternated in presenting the gospel of the kingdom 
              to the Greek philosopher. Rodan discovered that he had been well 
              instructed in Jesus' teachings by one of the former apostles of 
              John the Baptist who had been his teacher at Alexandria.  
                 
              
              1. THE PERSONALITY OF GOD 
              
               
                
              161:1.1 There was one matter on which Rodan and 
              the two apostles did not see alike, and that was the personality 
              of God. Rodan readily accepted all that was presented to him 
              regarding the attributes of God, but he contended that the Father 
              in heaven is not, cannot be, a person as man conceives 
              personality. While the apostles found themselves in difficulty 
              trying to prove that God is a person, Rodan found it still more 
              difficult to prove he is not a person.
                
              161:1.2 Rodan contended that the fact of 
              personality consists in the coexistent fact of full and mutual 
              communication between beings of equality, beings who are capable 
              of sympathetic understanding. Said Rodan: "In order to be a 
              person, God must have symbols of spirit communication which would 
              enable him to become fully understood by those who make contact 
              with him. But since God is infinite and eternal, the Creator of 
              all other beings, it follows that, as regards beings of equality, 
              God is alone in the universe. There are none equal to him; there 
              are none with whom he can communicate as an equal. God indeed may 
              be the source of all personality, but as such he is transcendent 
              to personality, even as the Creator is above and beyond the 
              creature."
                
              161:1.3 This contention greatly troubled Thomas 
              and Nathaniel, and they had asked Jesus to come to their rescue, 
              but the Master refused to enter into their discussions. He did say 
              to Thomas: "It matters little what idea of the Father you 
              may entertain as long as you are spiritually acquainted with the
              ideal of his infinite and eternal nature."
                
              161:1.4 Thomas contended that God does 
              communicate with man, and therefore that the Father is a person, 
              even within the definition of Rodan. This the Greek rejected on 
              the ground that God does not reveal himself personally; that he is 
              still a mystery. Then Nathaniel appealed to his own personal 
              experience with God, and that Rodan allowed, affirming that he had 
              recently had similar experiences, but these experiences, he 
              contended, proved only the reality of God, not his 
              personality.
                
              161:1.5 By Monday night Thomas gave up. But by 
              Tuesday night Nathaniel had won Rodan to believe in the 
              personality of the Father, and he effected this change in the 
              Greek's views by the following steps of reasoning:  
                
              161:1.6 1. The Father in Paradise does enjoy 
              equality of communication with at least two other beings who are 
              fully equal to himself and wholly like himself -- the Eternal Son 
              and the Infinite Spirit. In view of the doctrine of the Trinity, 
              the Greek was compelled to concede the personality possibility of 
              the Universal Father. (It was the later consideration of these 
              discussions which led to the enlarged conception of the Trinity in 
              the minds of the twelve apostles. Of course, it was the general 
              belief that Jesus was the Eternal Son.)  
                
              161:1.7 2. Since Jesus was equal with the 
              Father, and since this Son had achieved the manifestation of 
              personality to his earth children, such a phenomenon constituted 
              proof of the fact, and demonstration of the possibility, of the 
              possession of personality by all three of the Godheads and forever 
              settled the question regarding the ability of God to communicate 
              with man and the possibility of man's communicating with God.  
                
              161:1.8 3. That Jesus was on terms of mutual 
              association and perfect communication with man; that Jesus was the 
              Son of God. That the relation of Son and Father presupposes 
              equality of communication and mutuality of sympathetic 
              understanding; that Jesus and the Father were one. That Jesus 
              maintained at one and the same time understanding communication 
              with both God and man, and that, since both God and man 
              comprehended the meaning of the symbols of Jesus' communication, 
              both God and man possessed the attributes of personality in so far 
              as the requirements of the ability of intercommunication were 
              concerned. That the personality of Jesus demonstrated the 
              personality of God, while it proved conclusively the presence of 
              God in man. That two things which are related to the same thing 
              are related to each other.  
                
              161:1.9 4. That personality represents man's 
              highest concept of human reality and divine values; that God also 
              represents man's highest concept of divine reality and infinite 
              values; therefore, that God must be a divine and infinite 
              personality, a personality in reality although infinitely and 
              eternally transcending man's concept and definition of 
              personality, but nevertheless always and universally a 
              personality.  
                
              161:1.10 5. That God must be a personality since 
              he is the Creator of all personality and the destiny of all 
              personality. Rodan had been tremendously influenced by the 
              teaching of Jesus, "Be you therefore perfect, even as your Father 
              in heaven is perfect."  
                
              161:1.11 When Rodan heard these arguments, he 
              said: "I am convinced. I will confess God as a person if you will 
              permit me to qualify my confession of such a belief by attaching 
              to the meaning of personality a group of extended values, such as 
              superhuman, transcendent, supreme, infinite, eternal, final, and 
              universal. I am now convinced that, while God must be infinitely 
              more than a personality, he cannot be anything less. I am 
              satisfied to end the argument and to accept Jesus as the personal 
              revelation of the Father and the satisfaction of all unsatisfied 
              factors in logic, reason, and philosophy."  
                 
              
              2. THE DIVINE NATURE OF JESUS 
              
               
                 
              161:2.1 Since Nathaniel and Thomas had so fully 
              approved Rodan's views of the gospel of the kingdom, there 
              remained only one more point to consider, the teaching dealing 
              with the divine nature of Jesus, a doctrine only so recently 
              publicly announced. Nathaniel and Thomas jointly presented their 
              views of the divine nature of the Master, and the following 
              narrative is a condensed, rearranged, and restated presentation of 
              their teaching:  
                
              161:2.2 1. Jesus has admitted his divinity, and 
              we believe him. Many remarkable things have happened in connection 
              with his ministry which we can understand only by believing that 
              he is the Son of God as well as the Son of Man.  
                
              161:2.3 2. His life association with us 
              exemplifies the ideal of human friendship; only a divine being 
              could possibly be such a human friend. He is the most truly 
              unselfish person we have ever known. He is the friend even of 
              sinners; he dares to love his enemies. He is very loyal to us. 
              While he does not hesitate to reprove us, it is plain to all that 
              he truly loves us. The better you know him, the more you will love 
              him. You will be charmed by his unswerving devotion. Through all 
              these years of our failure to comprehend his mission, he has been 
              a faithful friend. While he makes no use of flattery, he does 
              treat us all with equal kindness; he is invariably tender and 
              compassionate. He has shared his life and everything else with us. 
              We are a happy community; we share all things in common. We do not 
              believe that a mere human could live such a blameless life under 
              such trying circumstances.  
                
              161:2.4 3. We think Jesus is divine because he 
              never does wrong; he makes no mistakes. His wisdom is 
              extraordinary; his piety superb. He lives day by day in perfect 
              accord with the Father's will. He never repents of misdeeds 
              because he transgresses none of the Father's laws. He prays for us 
              and with us, but he never asks us to pray for him. We believe that 
              he is consistently sinless. We do not think that one who is only 
              human ever professed to live such a life. He claims to live a 
              perfect life, and we acknowledge that he does. Our piety springs 
              from repentance, but his piety springs from righteousness. He even 
              professes to forgive sins and does heal diseases. No mere man 
              would sanely profess to forgive sin; that is a divine prerogative. 
              And he has seemed to be thus perfect in his righteousness from the 
              times of our first contact with him. We grow in grace and in the 
              knowledge of the truth, but our Master exhibits maturity of 
              righteousness to start with. All men, good and evil, recognize 
              these elements of goodness in Jesus. And yet never is his piety 
              obtrusive or ostentatious. He is both meek and fearless. He seems 
              to approve of our belief in his divinity. He is either what he 
              professes to be, or else he is the greatest hypocrite and fraud 
              the world has ever known. We are persuaded that he is just what he 
              claims to be.  
                
              161:2.5 4. The uniqueness of his character and 
              the perfection of his emotional control convince us that he is a 
              combination of humanity and divinity. He unfailingly responds to 
              the spectacle of human need; suffering never fails to appeal to 
              him. His compassion is moved alike by physical suffering, mental 
              anguish, or spiritual sorrow. He is quick to recognize and 
              generous to acknowledge the presence of faith or any other grace 
              in his fellow men. He is so just and fair and at the same time so 
              merciful and considerate. He grieves over the spiritual obstinacy 
              of the people and rejoices when they consent to see the light of 
              truth.  
                
              161:2.6 5. He seems to know the thoughts of 
              men's minds and to understand the longings of their hearts. And he 
              is always sympathetic with our troubled spirits. He seems to 
              possess all our human emotions, but they are magnificently 
              glorified. He strongly loves goodness and equally hates sin. He 
              possesses a superhuman consciousness of the presence of Deity. He 
              prays like a man but performs like a God. He seems to foreknow 
              things; he even now dares to speak about his death, some mystic 
              reference to his future glorification. While he is kind, he is 
              also brave and courageous. He never falters in doing his duty.  
                
              161:2.7 6. We are constantly impressed by the 
              phenomenon of his superhuman knowledge. Hardly does a day pass but 
              something transpires to disclose that the Master knows what is 
              going on away from his immediate presence. He also seems to know 
              about the thoughts of his associates. He undoubtedly has communion 
              with celestial personalities; he unquestionably lives on a 
              spiritual plane far above the rest of us. Everything seems to be 
              open to his unique understanding. He asks us questions to draw us 
              out, not to gain information.  
                
              161:2.8 7. Recently the Master does not hesitate 
              to assert his superhumanity. From the day of our ordination as 
              apostles right on down to recent times, he has never denied that 
              he came from the Father above. He speaks with the authority of a 
              divine teacher. The Master does not hesitate to refute the 
              religious teachings of today and to declare the new gospel with 
              positive authority. He is assertive, positive, and authoritative. 
              Even John the Baptist, when he heard Jesus speak, declared that he 
              was the Son of God. He seems to be so sufficient within himself. 
              He craves not the support of the multitude; he is indifferent to 
              the opinions of men. He is brave and yet so free from pride.  
                
              161:2.9 8. He constantly talks about God as an 
              ever-present associate in all that he does. He goes about doing 
              good, for God seems to be in him. He makes the most astounding 
              assertions about himself and his mission on earth, statements 
              which would be absurd if he were not divine. He once declared, 
              "Before Abraham was, I am." He has definitely claimed divinity; he 
              professes to be in partnership with God. He well-nigh exhausts the 
              possibilities of language in the reiteration of his claims of 
              intimate association with the heavenly Father. He even dares to 
              assert that he and the Father are one. He says that any one who 
              has seen him has seen the Father. And he says and does all these 
              tremendous things with such childlike naturalness. He alludes to 
              his association with the Father in the same manner that he refers 
              to his association with us. He seems to be so sure about God and 
              speaks of these relations in such a matter-of-fact way.  
                
              161:2.10 9. In his prayer life he appears to 
              communicate directly with his Father. We have heard few of his 
              prayers, but these few would indicate that he talks with God, as 
              it were, face to face. He seems to know the future as well as the 
              past. He simply could not be all of this and do all of these 
              extraordinary things unless he were something more than human. We 
              know he is human, we are sure of that, but we are almost equally 
              sure that he is also divine. We believe that he is divine. We are 
              convinced that he is the Son of Man and the Son of God.  
                
              161:2.11 When Nathaniel and Thomas had concluded 
              their conferences with Rodan, they hurried on toward Jerusalem to 
              join their fellow apostles, arriving on Friday of that week. This 
              had been a great experience in the lives of all three of these 
              believers, and the other apostles learned much from the recounting 
              of these experiences by Nathaniel and Thomas.
                
              161:2.12 Rodan made his way back to Alexandria, 
              where he long taught his philosophy in the school of Meganta. He 
              became a mighty man in the later affairs of the kingdom of heaven; 
              he was a faithful believer to the end of his earth days, yielding 
              up his life in Greece with others when the persecutions were at 
              their height.  
                 
              
              3. JESUS' HUMAN AND DIVINE MINDS 
              
              
               
                
              161:3.1 Consciousness of divinity was a gradual 
              growth in the mind of Jesus up to the occasion of his baptism. 
              After he became fully self-conscious of his divine nature, 
              prehuman existence, and universe prerogatives, he seems to have 
              possessed the power of variously limiting his human consciousness 
              of his divinity. It appears to us that from his baptism until the 
              crucifixion it was entirely optional with Jesus whether to depend 
              only on the human mind or to utilize the knowledge of both the 
              human and the divine minds. At times he appeared to avail himself 
              of only that information which was resident in the human 
              intellect. On other occasions he appeared to act with such 
              fullness of knowledge and wisdom as could be afforded only by the 
              utilization of the superhuman content of his divine consciousness.
                
              161:3.2 We can understand his unique 
              performances only by accepting the theory that he could, at will, 
              self-limit his divinity consciousness. We are fully cognizant that 
              he frequently withheld from his associates his foreknowledge of 
              events, and that he was aware of the nature of their thinking and 
              planning. We understand that he did not wish his followers to know 
              too fully that he was able to discern their thoughts and to 
              penetrate their plans. He did not desire too far to transcend the 
              concept of the human as it was held in the minds of his apostles 
              and disciples.
                
              161:3.3 We are utterly at a loss to 
              differentiate between his practice of self-limiting his divine 
              consciousness and his technique of concealing his preknowledge and 
              thought discernment from his human associates. We are convinced 
              that he used both of these techniques, but we are not always able, 
              in a given instance, to specify which method he may have employed. 
              We frequently observed him acting with only the human content of 
              consciousness; then would we behold him in conference with the 
              directors of the celestial hosts of the universe and discern the 
              undoubted functioning of the divine mind. And then on almost 
              numberless occasions did we witness the working of this combined 
              personality of man and God as it was activated by the apparent 
              perfect union of the human and the divine minds. This is the limit 
              of our knowledge of such phenomena; we really do not actually know 
              the full truth about this mystery.