… Closing Arguments:
This jury has seen the results of Lucifer's folly. We've traced it
for you from its birth through its effect on the popular culture
native to each of the rebellion-torn worlds. Now it's time to move
on, on to the issue of responsibility and accountability. As you
withdraw from this courtroom for deliberations, we would like for
you to ask yourselves the following three questions: One; what
exactly was Lucifer's transgression? Two; what was the effect on
those in his care? And three; even if he ran afoul of the law
unintentionally, once he realized that his actions were having a
harmful effect on those in his care, did he have sufficient
opportunity to recognize the error and take corrective steps?
Now we believe we have demonstrated that Lucifer did not simply
err, but that he willfully and deliberately undermined the best
interests of his younger siblings during the time he had been
entrusted with their nurture and care. He did this in three ways:
First, he denied the reality as well as the authority of the
Father. Second, he betrayed the trust vested in him while
challenging the authority and veracity of those who remained
faithful to that trust. Finally, he actively sought to thwart
Gods' purpose with respect to the progressive development and
ascendancy of human kind.
Lucifer's technique involved a cruel, sometimes subtle
deception as a means of encroaching on his fellows. Now what
exactly do we mean by encroachment? The local lexicon defines the
word as a gradual invasion by stealth, an infringement or an
intrusion. Though this is a workable definition, in this case
there is also a sophistry component that we will term
"self-aggrandizement." This latter concept describes the means
whereby Lucifer's victims become willingly self-deceived.
Throughout these arguments we will also make frequent use of
the term iniquity to mean that Lucifer did not, as defense counsel
suggests, just stumble into his transgression. The idea at the
heart of iniquity is a bit complex. So, to build a conceptual
framework, we must first underscore what we already know, that we
are not a race of automatons. We possess free will and along with
this choice endowment comes responsibility and the potential for
error, evil, sin and iniquity.
While we are free to choose, there are certain preconditions.
Though we are the final arbiters of our own destiny;
pre-destination and fore-ordination are reality factors. To put it
another way, each child of destiny has the power to accept or
reject the divine plan. Whether we achieve our first, best destiny
is entirely up to us.
Within our wide range of choices are contrastive perfection and
imperfection, the mature and the immature, the complete and the
incomplete. Between life and death stand the committed and the
uncommitted. To every race on every inhabited planet across a far
flung universe of universes, Our Creator's message is consistent;
"I set before you life and death, therefore choose life."
The first point of law is life, "therefore choose life." We
are, first and foremost, commanded to live. Evil, the reverse,
would run contrary to survival. Now we often have problems thrust
upon us or difficulty letting go of certain things, attitudes and
patterns of thought that tend to eclipse or impair an abundant
life. Anything that prevents us from living the most abundant life
possible is actual or potential evil by this definition. Figuring
out what's good and what's evil is part of the growth process,
right? Is experience a necessary part of life? Yes! Is there the
potential for error? Yes! Are you responsible for your decisions?
Of course! Are you unjustly held accountable for everything that
goes wrong in your life? Hardly! This case is not so much about
the things beyond our control or programmed responses, as it is
about gaining control through our free will choices.
Our Father did not create evil although he did create the gift
of free will. In so doing he created the potential for evil. Evil
did not originate with Lucifer either, though we would maintain
that he orchestrated a wholesale conversion of potential evil to
actual evil through his persistent choice and promotion of evil.
Although this case is not just about evil, we will review its
effects. Learning to prove all things and adhering to that which
is good is an essential part of life. There will undoubtedly be
errors, bad habits and perhaps even compulsion to overcome. But
once we've identified actual or potential evil and continue to
choose it, or refuse to let go of it, well, that's sin. I'm afraid
we've all engaged in a little of that.
You've heard or read that all have sinned. You've also heard it
said that the wages of sin is death. So why aren't we all dead? If
justice reigned supreme throughout this universe we probably would
be. Fortunately, for all of us, true justice is tempered with
mercy and divine justice will not destroy what mercy can save.
Mercy takes into account the fact of our weaknesses as growing,
imperfect beings. This case is not just about sin either, though
we will also consider this phenomenon.
Iniquity, that's what this case is about. It's not about
addiction, compulsive behavior or bad habits. It's not something
you stumble into, get goaded into or lured into. It's not
something we reluctantly choose or are forced to accept in a time
of weakness or out of ignorance. It is not an attempt at choosing
the lesser of two evils. Iniquity is willful defiance. It is when
evil or sin is deliberately chosen because it is contrary to the
law. It is the central issue in this case.
Lucifer engaged in iniquity through a deliberate and direct
assault on the organizing principle of the universes. He attacked
the unifying and coordinating qualities we've come to know as
truth, beauty and goodness. Where Our Father sows love, Lucifer
would have us sow hatred. Where we would reap love, Lucifer would
have us reap ill will. Where our rightful inheritance is family
unity, Lucifer advanced chaos.
Some believe that unity is purchased through uniformity. Others
hold that unity is only achieved at the expense of honest
deliberation. And so I put these questions to you in light of
these historical considerations: Was the Lucifer Rebellion
quashed? No! Was any effort made to suppress? No! That's not the
way we do things here. From the start of the Lucifer rebellion it
has been the policy of this government that each individual would
be left free and unmolested in his or her choice.
The rebellion was permitted to run its full course. Or, as they
say on the planet we are about to consider, "The dragon was loosed
for awhile." Why? Because we are dealing with a universe full of
free-willed individuals who must be afforded every opportunity to
make an informed, deliberate, wholehearted and final choice. Again
you may ask, why? It is because the Father desires only the
devotion that is voluntary and sophistry proof.
Now that all of the evidence is currently before you, we will
review with a special emphasis on one small evolving sphere. Of
all the worlds that were quarantined as a result of the Lucifer
Rebellion, the clearest example by far of its harmful effect is
the planet we have used as our case study throughout this trial. I
would again direct your attention to a tiny evolving planet on the
back-road to infinity, known to its inhabitants as Earth.
Our Beloved Sovereign's bestowal upon Earth served to augment
his Divine Right with Supreme Authority. He became wholly and
unreservedly dependent on Our Father and the Family of Man. He
lived such a life as he imposes upon the children of His Creation.
And His Administration is now the embodiment of Universe Wisdom.
It was in this voluntarily assumed humble estate, and upon a
confused and disordered planet that the Son of God, as the Son of
Man, confronted the forces of darkness.
While to us Earth is known as the world of the cross, it is
more than just a marker in space. It has profound meaning to an
entire universe. Though it's also more than just a marker in time,
to the people of the planet, time is reckoned from the days of Our
Lord. Some groups on earth think of it as the fulcrum of time.
And, the oldest language in use on the planet is Chinese where the
word symbol for Earth is a cross on the horizon. From the time
this prophetic element was first introduced to the language of the
realm, through present day, the lessons of the cross continue.
We have seen the evidence and we're all aware of what has
happened throughout the turbulent history of Earth. Certain
megalomanic clergy, royalty and military leaders have jockeyed for
position, often in an attempt to exercise total control over human
kind. Such struggles for domination continue and most, but not
all, are easy to recognize as such. In these arguments though, we
will focus our attention on the fleeting shadow of insurrection,
the hidden sophistry and the subtle deception.
To accomplish this, we will indulge in a somewhat circumscribed
world view. I now direct your attention to a point in time on the
planet's western hemisphere where, for the most part, issues of
personal freedom are freely debated. The European dark ages are
giving way as new opportunities emerge. You may also recall there
was a struggle on the North American continent where we witnessed
a man by the name of Patrick Henry shouting "Give me liberty or
give me death." Following this rallying cry, there was a
much-heralded triumph of liberty over oppression that resulted in
the birth of a promising new nation. Since that time, within the
very same nation, we have seen the concept of liberty take quite a
beating, usually in the very name of liberty.
This is where sophistry comes into play. This is where we must
learn to recognize the subtle deception we spoke of earlier in
these arguments. Look, we each have a pretty basic understanding
of liberty. We think of freedom, independence, emancipation,
self-determination, autonomy, etc. All very good concepts and each
related, in its own way, to the gift of free will. This is fertile
ground for quality growth and a testing ground for us all.
With respect to the sophistry, to the subtle deception, this is
where it all begins. And this is also where it ends. For at the
very heart of iniquity stands Lucifer, the self-proclaimed "God of
Liberty." For his cause and for these proceedings the true meaning
of liberty is pivotal. As he promoted and claimed credit for
liberty, the idea of gratefully receiving God's gift of true
liberty was eclipsed by Lucifer's insatiable appetite, and his
propensity for taking license in the name of liberty.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, at what point does
responsibility kick in? To put it another, more personal way, has
another individual ever violated you? If so, wasn't that person
just exercising their freedom? At what point does their exercise
of freedom adversely impact you and violate your rights? At what
point should another person's freedom be conditioned or curtailed?
On Earth the concept of freedom is treasured. And yet there is
so much confusion concerning this very concept that liberty is in
serious jeopardy. And this is largely because of a gradual and
unrecognized encroachment made possible through an adulterated
concept of liberty featuring the routine divorce of rights and
responsibility. It is often overlooked due to the failure to make
a distinction between liberty and license.
On Earth that population's inability, combined with its
unwillingness to recognize and expose certain sophistries, led to
a definite retrograde motion where societal evolution is
concerned. The most basic human institutions have been
destabilized to the point that they are widely regarded as
untrustworthy. Much of what was once foundational is no longer
deemed desirable. An impetuous leadership has dismissed mature and
dependable systems of values in favor of poorly defined, baser
sets.
That's the broad sketch, ladies and gentlemen. There will be a
lot of clarifying detail offered as we proceed throughout this
presentation. But first, I want to say a few words about the
special mandate guiding my team.
In this, the argument phase of Lucifer's trial, we have been
asked by the court to represent the interests of, and advocate
for, the innocent children of a vast universe. That is precisely
what we intend to do with special emphasis on the consequential
damages. This will take some time, so make yourselves comfortable.
As it is with the breakup of any family, it is the children who
have suffered the most. It is the children who are often used for
leverage by unscrupulous and self-indulgent elders. These children
emerge out of balance as victims of process and control. They have
so much taken from them because they are too young, too
inexperienced, and lack the power to protect themselves.
Ours is a serious mandate. Though we will take you through many
of the same issues reviewed by the other parties to this case, we
are concerned with the flow downs, the fallout and we are
re-examining these issues to understand the effect on the innocent
child. Our beloved Sovereign addressed this issue on Earth two
thousand years ago when he said, "As for he who causes these
little ones to stumble, it would be better for him if a millstone
were tied about his neck and he were cast into the sea."
We will focus on the children and their increased likelihood of
stumbling as a result of Lucifer's self-indulgent behavior. We
will leave the question of Lucifer's punishment for the remedy
phase.
It would be difficult, if not impossible, to truly advocate for
children without considering the plight of those engaged in, and
charged with, responsibility for their care. We're telling you
this now so you will understand why this review will often venture
into areas that seem to be more about the adults than the
children. Just remember that we must view the problem in the
context of nurture and parenting. And that it takes healthy
informed parents to best serve the interests of their children. |