Human beings exhibit a natural tendency to blame shift, to
avoid accountability. The "Devil" thereby receives much credit
that he doesn't deserve. We, as growing individuals, each have a
lot of sorting and sifting ahead of us and we all share the
tendency to be misled by too much self-contemplation. That is not
to say that seduction by others should not be considered as a
mitigating factor, but the apostate princes have been largely
impotent since the days of the cross. Those individual humans
ensnared by sophistry since that time cannot deny that personal
choice was a contributing, if not the controlling factor. If
Lucifer's folly was to act in ways unintelligent, unconditioned
and uncontrolled then what's to keep each of us, as individuals,
from the same indiscretions? How can we be sure that our own
intelligence, conditioning and controls are solidly in place, in
accordance with the grand design, the Creator's will for us?
Amidst all the noise and confusion, is there a reliable rule of
thumb for determining God's will?
There is! But first, we must recognize just who the Father is,
and that it's not enough to simply accept the Fatherhood of God.
The Father is the first source and center of all reality. He is
the one and only uncaused cause. And, while his dwelling place is
the geographic center of Infinity he is, at the same time,
omnipresent. But, there is a concurrent truth that must also be
embraced.
Fatherhood implies offspring. God is first and foremost a
divine parent. Our Father's children must also be recognized and
loved. Any Earthly movement that has tried to rejoice in the
fatherhood of God without also accepting the brotherhood and
sisterhood of human kind has fallen far short of what the Father
expects. Religious groups that operate as islands unto themselves
have only contributed to a world of misery.
Lucifer knew that to deny the person and the will of God is to
flirt with cosmic psychosis. To be fully compatible with the
cosmos, God-knowing persons exercising their personal liberties
must be reality centered, operate in accordance with the golden
rule and at the same time make allowances for individual growth.
Experiential growth is always dependant upon diminishing external
restraints linked to augmenting internal restraints. Moving from
the state of being controlled to self-control and self-mastery
depends on these and other factors of growth.
Maintaining self-control in an unchanging, static environment
is one thing; exercising self-mastery through a series of
challenges in an ever-changing environment is the true test. If
getting reality centered is prerequisite to intelligence, then by
all means, call upon God. It would also be helpful, in this case,
to further examine the evolution of the subject world and
phenomena associated with its unique reality presentation.
So much of what constitutes disappointment to the Earth bound
can be traced to faith problems. The tendency towards misplaced
faith must be understood, and to be understood must be seen in the
context of those numerous dependencies and other problems
associated with growth. We begin our examination with, what has
come to be known on Earth as, the dependency cycle.
Humans cycle through many things, including what they call
dependence, co-dependence, independence and interdependence, to
what we will now term utter-dependence. Just when they think they
have achieved control, have grown out of dependency or
co-dependency relationships, their horizons are broadened and
their perspective changes. They are reminded of the interrelated
larger family. As their much sought after independence turns into
a hollow loneliness and gets traded for interdependence they move
God ward. This is contrary to what the popular culture would lead
them to believe. The height of maturity is achieved when, as
cosmic citizens, they recognize the Creator, Controller and
Upholder while realizing they are utterly and completely dependent
on God as well as the things and beings of God.
Now you may be wondering, what does this have to do with, or
how does this mesh with, self-control? Let me answer that with
another question or two. Is a rudderless ship in control? Could an
individual attempting to navigate without the benefit of rudder,
charts, sextant, knowledge of atmospheric and sea conditions or
familiarity with the craft truly be called its master? Or, would
the graduating class of fourteen ninety two vote such a person
"most likely to fall off the edge of the Earth?"
To achieve any form of mastery one must not only know where
they are going, but how to get there. They must also develop a
healthy respect for the obstacles, physical and psychological,
along the way.
Individual humans will, as a normal part of growth, continue to
experience new centricities and eccentricities not unlike the
paradigm shift that took place as a result of the Copernican
revolution on Earth. For example, the egocentric infant is acutely
aware of the mother's revolutions about him. From his perceptual
standpoint or lay-point, he is the center of infinity, but only
until such time as he is challenged.
Like the child, whole societies must trade childlike
perceptions for larger realities if they are to grow. The
egocentric is traded for the family-centric. Geocentric planetary
systems are traded for heliocentric ones and now, thanks to space
telescopes orbiting Earth, great spiral galaxies are seen to be
moving about some unseen universe center. The olden prophet
described this center as obscured by light, and behold, from the
modern Earth astronomer's viewpoint it has been revealed, the
prophet was right. But there's so much more to the cosmos than
astrophysics. And it takes more than three dimensional thinking to
comprehend what is far more than holographic paradigm.
But, as a direct consequence of the Lucifer insurrection, the
human masses have been conditioned for disbelief. Like fleas in a
closed jar, humans have practiced thought under a conceptual
ceiling. Once the lid is removed the fleas can't jump out of the
jar due to muscle conditioning. Likewise individual humans have
limited their leaps of faith as well as their flights of fancy for
reasons directly traceable to an unhealthy conditioning that
yields in turn a variety of cognitive distortions obscuring truth
as well as fact. This holds for the wage slave, the abused spouse
or even whole societies.
As they do with a series of love affairs gone bad, humans
oftentimes feel they can avoid the frustrations associated with
misplaced faith simply by giving up. Often, upon considering their
disillusionment and general skepticism, those resident on the
planet at the beginning of the third millennium point to some
major personal or historical event as a significant factor
contributing to a so called "loss of faith." We will examine just
a few of these factors.
According to much of the Western Hemisphere's conventional and
contemporary wisdom, the most popular justification cited for
losing faith is a once childlike enchantment with Santa Claus.
Many adults as well as adolescents, for reasons not carefully
considered, equate the belief in God to believing in Santa.
North American adults embracing the tradition of Santa
generally acknowledge commercial embellishments by a certain
beverage maker. They trace the symbol back through the ad campaign
of a retail store chain, back through the Dutch tradition of
Sinter Klaas (Saint Nicholas), to the fourth century and certain
facts surrounding the life of the Bishop of Myra.
There, in what is now modern day Turkey was an unpretentious,
kind-hearted man who took impish delight in brightening up the
lives of those less fortunate. Whether it was by tossing a coin
purse through an open window or leaving a goose by the front door,
this man exemplified giving.
Now even some Christians object to the tradition of Santa
because, after all, the Christmas season is supposed to be about
the birth of Jesus. Of course, after they are seriously vested in
this line of argument, they discover it was Christian society that
moved the feast of Saint Nicholas from December sixth to December
twenty fifth. On further investigation, they find no historical
record supporting December twenty fifth as the day of incarnation.
The facts suggest that Paul, in extending the franchise,
attached a tradition that was very much in vogue throughout his
home province of Tarsus. That tradition was an annual celebration
by the Mithraic cult. Their holiday focused on the steadily
increasing daylight hours following the winter solstice, seen as
heralding the triumph of the god of light over the god of
darkness.
Almost overnight Jesus, as the Light of the World and the Light
of Truth, displaced the Mithraic tradition much as greatly
enhanced value often displaces fact. Of course this creates even
greater problems for those unable to discern, or unwilling to
accept, the difference.
There are those of us who are, to use the vernacular, simply
hell bent, whose light of truth is refracted to the point where
its spectral array is almost imperceptible. There are some whose
concept of beauty is selectively filtered and so contextualized
that the gift itself is never beheld. And there are others of us
to whom goodness is systematically disqualified so that our own
righteousness may never be challenged and our rightful inheritance
is never enjoyed.
As for a benevolent Santa Clause, if, despite
commercialization, the modern tradition finds its roots in the
life of this good man from Myra, we submit that while the story of
Santa as handed down may not be altogether factual, it is in the
larger sense true. And we pray that the tradition will be
sustained to the extent that it appeals to a spirit of generosity.
One can not compensate for lost truth with mere facts,
especially questionable facts. For those not inclined to faith
there will always be reasons aplenty to support faithlessness. To
those who cultivate faith or who possess a strong faith there can
still be problems. Humans who place their faith in humans and
human institutions are courting disappointment. From
assassinations to inquisitions, from the first examples of
genocide to the twentieth century holocaust to the problem of
pedophile priests and bad faith bishops, there is no shortage of
man made disillusionment.
There is no reason to expect that the most basic human
institutions are immune to such maladies. And this is evidenced by
the erosion of civilized standards. Certain devotees of Lucifer
and his values have been highly successful at redefining virtue.
Mercy is rejected with increasing contempt and disdain. Some
continue to choose blindness to cosmic relationships. Chruchianity
continues to sell indulgences. Divorcing parents indulge their
anger at the expense of their children. Powerful simpletons in
government interpret freedom of religion as meaning freedom from
religion.
Until such time as those embracing sin have made the full
choice of their own moral bankruptcy and spiritual extinction,
things will get worse, not better, for the people of Earth.
Enduring justice will always be predicated on the laws that God
himself has established. Although unlimited in potential and while
certainly not under the law, God is limited by his own volition as
expressed through His laws, and as they pertain to the physical
universe, life and interpersonal relationships. Lucifer did not
have to violate the law to understand the outcome of his rebellion
any more than an Earth scientist must continually retest for the
presence of gravity. The results are and were clearly foreseeable
in each case. |